Reliability of a patient-reported outcome measure in schizophrenia: Results from back-to-back self-ratings

Hiroyoshi Takeuchi, Gagan Fervaha, Gary Remington

研究成果: Article査読

8 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

This study aimed to assess patient's capacity to perform a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure (i.e., a self-rating scale) and examine its relationship with clinical characteristics including cognition. Fifty patients with schizophrenia were asked to rate the Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptics scale – Short form (SWNS) twice; the second rating was started immediately after they completed the first to minimize the gap between ratings. At the same time, the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS) and Brief Neurocognitive Assessment (BNA) were administered. The correlations between the two ratings for the SWNS total and each item scores were high (rs=0.94 and rs=0.60–0.84, respectively); however, for 16 (80%) of 20 items, 5 or more patients (i.e., ≥10%) demonstrated a>1 point score difference. There was no significant correlation between the SWNS total score difference and any clinical characteristics including age, education duration, illness duration, antipsychotic dose, psychopathology, and cognition. In contrast, the number of items with a>1 point score difference was significantly correlated with disorganized symptoms and overall severity (rs=0.29 for both), as well as working memory and global cognition (rs=−0.41 and rs=−0.40, respectively). These findings suggest that PROs should be interpreted with caution in patients with schizophrenia with prominent disorganization and cognitive impairment.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)415-419
ページ数5
ジャーナルPsychiatry Research
244
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2016 10 30

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 精神医学および精神衛生
  • 生物学的精神医学

フィンガープリント

「Reliability of a patient-reported outcome measure in schizophrenia: Results from back-to-back self-ratings」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル