Risk implications of long-term global climate goals: Overall conclusions of the ICA-RUS project

Seita Emori, Kiyoshi Takahashi, Yoshiki Yamagata, Shinjiro Kanae, Shunsuke Mori, Yuko Fujigaki

研究成果: Article査読

8 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

We have assessed the risks associated with setting 1.5, 2.0, or 2.5 °C temperature goals and ways to manage them in a systematic manner and discussed their implications. The results suggest that, given the uncertainties in climate sensitivity, “net zero emissions of anthropogenic greenhouse gases in the second half of this century” is a more actionable goal for society than the 2 or 1.5 °C temperature goals themselves. If the climate sensitivity is proven to be relatively high and the temperature goals are not met even when the net zero emission goal is achieved, the options left are: (A) accepting/adapting to a warmer world, (B) boosting mitigation, and (C) climate geoengineering, or any combination of these. This decision should be made based on a deeper discussion of risks associated with each option. We also suggest the need to consider a wider range of policies: not only climate policies, but also broader “sustainability policies”, and to envisage more innovative solutions than what integrated assessment models can currently illustrate. Finally, based on a consideration of social aspects of risk decisions, we recommend the establishment of a panel of “intermediate layer” experts, who support decision-making by citizens as well as social and ethical thinking by policy makers.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)279-289
ページ数11
ジャーナルSustainability Science
13
2
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2018 3月
外部発表はい

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 地球変動および惑星変動
  • 健康(社会科学)
  • 地理、計画および開発
  • 生態学
  • 社会学および政治科学
  • 自然保全および景観保全
  • 管理、モニタリング、政策と法律

フィンガープリント

「Risk implications of long-term global climate goals: Overall conclusions of the ICA-RUS project」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル