TY - JOUR
T1 - Sarcoplasmic MxA expression A valuable marker of dermatomyositis
AU - Uruha, Akinori
AU - Nishikawa, Atsuko
AU - Tsuburaya, Rie S.
AU - Hamanaka, Kohei
AU - Kuwana, Masataka
AU - Watanabe, Yurika
AU - Suzuki, Shigeaki
AU - Suzuki, Norihiro
AU - Nishino, Ichizo
PY - 2017/1/31
Y1 - 2017/1/31
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of myxovirus resistance A (MxA) expression in the cytoplasm of myofibers in the diagnosis of dermatomyositis (DM). Methods: We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the sarcoplasmic expression of MxA in muscles with DM by immunohistochemistry in consecutive cases of DM (n 5 34) and other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (n 5120: 8 with polymyositis, 16 with anti-TRNA-synthetase antibody-Associated myositis, 46 with immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, and 50 with inclusion body myositis) and compared them with conventional pathologic hallmarks of DM, including perifascicular atrophy (PFA) and membrane attack complex (MAC) deposition on endomysial capillaries. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of sarcoplasmic MxA expression were 71% and 98%, respectively. While the specificity was almost comparable to that of PFA and capillary MAC deposition, the sensitivity was higher, with PFA showing 47% sensitivity and 98% specificity and capillary MAC deposition showing 35% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Of note, in patients with DM with typical skin rash but no PFA, 44% of the samples showed sarcoplasmic MxA expression, which was higher than the 17% sensitivity of capillary MAC deposition in the population. Conclusions: Sarcoplasmic MxA expression detected by immunohistochemistry is a more sensitive marker of DM than the conventional hallmarks, indicating its practical utility in the diagnosis of DM. It may well be included in the routine immunohistochemistry panel for myositis.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of myxovirus resistance A (MxA) expression in the cytoplasm of myofibers in the diagnosis of dermatomyositis (DM). Methods: We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the sarcoplasmic expression of MxA in muscles with DM by immunohistochemistry in consecutive cases of DM (n 5 34) and other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (n 5120: 8 with polymyositis, 16 with anti-TRNA-synthetase antibody-Associated myositis, 46 with immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, and 50 with inclusion body myositis) and compared them with conventional pathologic hallmarks of DM, including perifascicular atrophy (PFA) and membrane attack complex (MAC) deposition on endomysial capillaries. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of sarcoplasmic MxA expression were 71% and 98%, respectively. While the specificity was almost comparable to that of PFA and capillary MAC deposition, the sensitivity was higher, with PFA showing 47% sensitivity and 98% specificity and capillary MAC deposition showing 35% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Of note, in patients with DM with typical skin rash but no PFA, 44% of the samples showed sarcoplasmic MxA expression, which was higher than the 17% sensitivity of capillary MAC deposition in the population. Conclusions: Sarcoplasmic MxA expression detected by immunohistochemistry is a more sensitive marker of DM than the conventional hallmarks, indicating its practical utility in the diagnosis of DM. It may well be included in the routine immunohistochemistry panel for myositis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011275788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011275788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003568
DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003568
M3 - Article
C2 - 28039312
AN - SCOPUS:85011275788
SN - 0028-3878
VL - 88
SP - 493
EP - 500
JO - Neurology
JF - Neurology
IS - 5
ER -