TY - JOUR
T1 - Soft Assets Consideration in Smart and Resilient City Development
AU - Wataya, Eiko
AU - Shaw, Rajib
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This research was funded by Keio University Fukusawa Research Funding.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - For a smart city, soft or non-physical assets share an important capital component with many impacts in different contexts. They enable a city to deliver and mainstream a people-centered policy in addition to the benefits provided by traditional, hard infrastructure. Soft assets can involve social and human capital, knowledge, participation, and innovative approaches that drive value in the city. However, it is always a challenge for city policy makers to identify and strengthen these soft assets using a systemic approach due to their inherent characteristics. This paper argues that soft assets should be strategically integrated into the development process of smart and resilient cities. Therefore, exploring various approaches to prioritize soft asset consideration would provide helpful guidelines to city policy makers for municipal value creation, and identify where the greatest needs for soft or intangible assets lie. This paper examines how to identify and decide which soft assets should take priority in smart and resilient cities. The findings can assist policy makers in their consideration of an optimal mix and balance of soft assets required in the city to improve living structures for a people-centered approach.
AB - For a smart city, soft or non-physical assets share an important capital component with many impacts in different contexts. They enable a city to deliver and mainstream a people-centered policy in addition to the benefits provided by traditional, hard infrastructure. Soft assets can involve social and human capital, knowledge, participation, and innovative approaches that drive value in the city. However, it is always a challenge for city policy makers to identify and strengthen these soft assets using a systemic approach due to their inherent characteristics. This paper argues that soft assets should be strategically integrated into the development process of smart and resilient cities. Therefore, exploring various approaches to prioritize soft asset consideration would provide helpful guidelines to city policy makers for municipal value creation, and identify where the greatest needs for soft or intangible assets lie. This paper examines how to identify and decide which soft assets should take priority in smart and resilient cities. The findings can assist policy makers in their consideration of an optimal mix and balance of soft assets required in the city to improve living structures for a people-centered approach.
KW - Intangible assets
KW - Living structures
KW - People-centered strategies
KW - Smart and resilient city
KW - Soft assets
KW - Value creation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123754712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123754712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/smartcities5010007
DO - 10.3390/smartcities5010007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85123754712
SN - 2624-6511
VL - 5
SP - 108
EP - 130
JO - Smart Cities
JF - Smart Cities
IS - 1
ER -