The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: Is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?

Ayano Akita, Akihiro Tanimoto, Hiromitsu Jinno, Kaori Kameyama, Sachio Kuribayashi

研究成果: Article

30 引用 (Scopus)

抜粋

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of bilateral breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) in patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography and negative ultrasound findings. Fifty patients underwent MRI before stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVAB). MR findings were classified into five types for interpretation, and types 4 and 5 were considered malignant. SVAB revealed 13 carcinomas and 37 benign lesions. Malignant lesions were more frequently found in cases of positive MRI diagnoses than in negative MRI diagnoses (P<0.001). Mammography had a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 24% and an accuracy of 44%, whereas mammography plus MRI had a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 100% and an accuracy of 96%. In the evaluation of mammographically detected microcalcifications, bilateral breast MRI is of good diagnostic value and may alter the indications for SVAB.

元の言語English
ページ(範囲)2089-2096
ページ数8
ジャーナルEuropean radiology
19
発行部数9
DOI
出版物ステータスPublished - 2009 4 8

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

フィンガープリント The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: Is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?' の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらはともに一意のフィンガープリントを構成します。

  • これを引用