TY - JOUR
T1 - The kernel of a patent licensing game
T2 - The optimal number of licensees
AU - Kishimoto, Shin
AU - Watanabe, Naoki
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank Chih Chang, Theo Driessen, Yukihiko Funaki, Hideshi Itoh, Hideo Konishi, Shigeo Muto, Cheng-zhong Qin, Satoshi Takahashi, participants in 1st Caribbean Game Theory Conference (Netherlands Antilles), 17th Decentralization Conference (Japan), 4th World Congress of the Game Theory Society (Turkey), 2013 Asian Meeting of the Econometric Society (Singapore), 2014 ORSJ Spring Conference (Japan), and 14th SAET Conference (Japan), and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. This research was supported by the JSPS Grant-in-Aid 24310110, 24730163 and 15K17017 (Kishimoto) and the MEXT Grant-in-Aid 20310086 (Watanabe).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - This paper considers general bargaining outcomes under coalition structures formed by an external patent holder and firms in oligopoly markets, where a coalition structure is eventually determined by the patent holder. Our main proposition is that, for each permissible coalition structure, the kernel is a singleton; thus, the number of licensees that maximizes the patent holder's revenue can be determined with the kernel. Specifying the upper and lower bounds of the kernel for each coalition structure, we also provide the sufficient conditions for the integer that maximizes the licensees’ total surplus to be the optimal number of licensees for the patent holder. The numerical comparison of the bargaining outcomes to those obtained by non-cooperative licensing by means of fee through take-it-or-leave-it offers is provided for a cost-reducing innovation in a linear Cournot market. Regardless of the ways of licensing, the producer surplus is maximized when the magnitude of cost reduction is large.
AB - This paper considers general bargaining outcomes under coalition structures formed by an external patent holder and firms in oligopoly markets, where a coalition structure is eventually determined by the patent holder. Our main proposition is that, for each permissible coalition structure, the kernel is a singleton; thus, the number of licensees that maximizes the patent holder's revenue can be determined with the kernel. Specifying the upper and lower bounds of the kernel for each coalition structure, we also provide the sufficient conditions for the integer that maximizes the licensees’ total surplus to be the optimal number of licensees for the patent holder. The numerical comparison of the bargaining outcomes to those obtained by non-cooperative licensing by means of fee through take-it-or-leave-it offers is provided for a cost-reducing innovation in a linear Cournot market. Regardless of the ways of licensing, the producer surplus is maximized when the magnitude of cost reduction is large.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010886939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010886939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2017.01.001
DO - 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2017.01.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85010886939
SN - 0165-4896
VL - 86
SP - 37
EP - 50
JO - Mathematical Social Sciences
JF - Mathematical Social Sciences
ER -