TY - GEN
T1 - Time to Arrival as Predictor for Uncertainty and Cooperative Driving Decisions in Highly Automated Driving
AU - Miller, Linda
AU - Leitner, Jasmin
AU - Kraus, Johannes
AU - Lee, Jieun
AU - Daimon, Tatsuru
AU - Kitazaki, Satoshi
AU - Baumann, Martin
N1 - Funding Information:
funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 IEEE.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Due to the technical advances of automated vehicles (AVs), new uncertainties for human road users arise. To overcome these uncertainties, driving strategies of AVs might be aligned to human interaction styles. In vehicle-vehicle interactions, driving behavior is informed by remaining time gaps between vehicles. This video-based experiment investigated the influence of gap sizes and the measurement method on driving decisions. N=32 participants experienced a highly automated drive in which their AV approached narrow passages. The time to arrival (TTA) of the oncoming traffic was varied. Participants had to decide to drive first or second, indicate their decision certainty, and the situation's criticality. The videos were presented in ascending, descending, and random order. Moreover, participants adjusted the TTA at which they would drive first and second. The results indicated a higher probability of driving first and lower criticality with increasing TTA. Decision certainty was lowest around the 50% threshold, while longer and shorter TTAs resulted in higher certainty. Results differed between the methods. The findings provide guidance for the design of automated systems to mimic human driving behavior.
AB - Due to the technical advances of automated vehicles (AVs), new uncertainties for human road users arise. To overcome these uncertainties, driving strategies of AVs might be aligned to human interaction styles. In vehicle-vehicle interactions, driving behavior is informed by remaining time gaps between vehicles. This video-based experiment investigated the influence of gap sizes and the measurement method on driving decisions. N=32 participants experienced a highly automated drive in which their AV approached narrow passages. The time to arrival (TTA) of the oncoming traffic was varied. Participants had to decide to drive first or second, indicate their decision certainty, and the situation's criticality. The videos were presented in ascending, descending, and random order. Moreover, participants adjusted the TTA at which they would drive first and second. The results indicated a higher probability of driving first and lower criticality with increasing TTA. Decision certainty was lowest around the 50% threshold, while longer and shorter TTAs resulted in higher certainty. Results differed between the methods. The findings provide guidance for the design of automated systems to mimic human driving behavior.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135369651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135369651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/IV51971.2022.9827416
DO - 10.1109/IV51971.2022.9827416
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85135369651
T3 - IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings
SP - 1048
EP - 1053
BT - 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, IV 2022
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, IV 2022
Y2 - 5 June 2022 through 9 June 2022
ER -