TY - JOUR
T1 - Treating Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia
T2 - an Update
AU - Remington, Gary
AU - Foussias, George
AU - Fervaha, Gagan
AU - Agid, Ofer
AU - Takeuchi, Hiroyoshi
AU - Lee, Jimmy
AU - Hahn, Margaret
N1 - Funding Information:
Gagan Fervaha declares that he has no conflict of interest. Margaret Hahn declares that she has no conflict of interest. Gary Remington reports personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work. George Foussias reports personal fees from Hoffman-La Roche, personal fees from Lunbeck, outside the submitted work. Ofer Agid reports grants and personal fees from Janssen-Ortho (Johnson & Johnson), personal fees from Novartis; grants and personal fees from Sunovion; personal fees from Lundbeck; personal fees from Mylan Pharmaceuticals; and personal fees from Otsuka, outside the submitted work. Hiroyoshi Takeuchi reports grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and personal fees from Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, outside the submitted work. Jimmy Lee reports personal fees from Roche during the conduct of the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, The Author(s).
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - Interest in the negative symptoms of schizophrenia has increased rapidly over the last several decades, paralleling a growing interest in functional, in addition to clinical, recovery, and evidence underscoring the importance negative symptoms play in the former. Efforts continue to better define and measure negative symptoms, distinguish their impact from that of other symptom domains, and establish effective treatments as well as trials to assess these. Multiple interventions have been the subject of investigation, to date, including numerous pharmacological strategies, brain stimulation, and non-somatic approaches. Level and quality of evidence vary considerably, but to this point, no specific treatment can be recommended. This is particularly problematic for individuals burdened with negative symptoms in the face of mild or absent positive symptoms. Presently, clinicians will sometimes turn to interventions that are seen as more “benign” and in line with routine clinical practice. Strategies include use of atypical antipsychotics, ensuring the lowest possible antipsychotic dose that maintains control of positive symptoms (this can involve a shift from antipsychotic polypharmacy to monotherapy), possibly an antidepressant trial (given diagnostic uncertainty and the frequent use of these drugs in schizophrenia), and non-somatic interventions (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy, CBT). The array and diversity of strategies currently under investigation highlight the lack of evidence-based treatments and our limited understanding regarding negative symptoms underlying etiology and pathophysiology. Their onset, which can precede the first psychotic break, also means that treatments are delayed. From this perspective, identification of biomarkers and/or endophenotypes permitting earlier diagnosis and intervention may serve to improve treatment efficacy as well as outcomes.
AB - Interest in the negative symptoms of schizophrenia has increased rapidly over the last several decades, paralleling a growing interest in functional, in addition to clinical, recovery, and evidence underscoring the importance negative symptoms play in the former. Efforts continue to better define and measure negative symptoms, distinguish their impact from that of other symptom domains, and establish effective treatments as well as trials to assess these. Multiple interventions have been the subject of investigation, to date, including numerous pharmacological strategies, brain stimulation, and non-somatic approaches. Level and quality of evidence vary considerably, but to this point, no specific treatment can be recommended. This is particularly problematic for individuals burdened with negative symptoms in the face of mild or absent positive symptoms. Presently, clinicians will sometimes turn to interventions that are seen as more “benign” and in line with routine clinical practice. Strategies include use of atypical antipsychotics, ensuring the lowest possible antipsychotic dose that maintains control of positive symptoms (this can involve a shift from antipsychotic polypharmacy to monotherapy), possibly an antidepressant trial (given diagnostic uncertainty and the frequent use of these drugs in schizophrenia), and non-somatic interventions (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy, CBT). The array and diversity of strategies currently under investigation highlight the lack of evidence-based treatments and our limited understanding regarding negative symptoms underlying etiology and pathophysiology. Their onset, which can precede the first psychotic break, also means that treatments are delayed. From this perspective, identification of biomarkers and/or endophenotypes permitting earlier diagnosis and intervention may serve to improve treatment efficacy as well as outcomes.
KW - Brain stimulation
KW - Negative symptoms
KW - Pharmacotherapy
KW - Schizophrenia
KW - Treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009743523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009743523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40501-016-0075-8
DO - 10.1007/s40501-016-0075-8
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85009743523
SN - 2196-3061
VL - 3
SP - 133
EP - 150
JO - Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry
JF - Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry
IS - 2
ER -