TY - JOUR
T1 - What does it take to become “one of us?” Redefining ethnic-civic citizenship using markers of everyday nationhood
AU - Leong, Chan Hoong
AU - Komisarof, Adam
AU - Dandy, Justine
AU - Jasinskaja-Lahti, Inga
AU - Safdar, Saba
AU - Hanke, Katja
AU - Teng, Eugene
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - In this study we examined what are the markers of immigrant naturalisation as seen from the perspectives of recipient nationals. Social markers are perceptual signposts that receiving nationals use in deciding whether a non-native born is a member of the destination country. In short, what should immigrants do in order to be accepted by receiving nationals as “one of us”. Cross national data on 20 indicators of “everyday nationhood” were collected from five countries – Singapore, Japan, Australia, Finland, and Canada. The markers highlight common dispositions, activities, or social norms that are associated with citizenship. Exploratory factor analysis in each sample consistently demonstrated a two-factor structure model that supports the contemporary ethnic-civic distinction, but the markers that make up each of the two dimensions vary between countries. No metric equivalence was found, and that the markers have culture-specific meanings. The framework offers a novel insight to intercultural relations. The results suggest that adaptation and social inclusion need to consider the norms and values practised in the recipient society, and how immigration may redefine intergroup boundaries.
AB - In this study we examined what are the markers of immigrant naturalisation as seen from the perspectives of recipient nationals. Social markers are perceptual signposts that receiving nationals use in deciding whether a non-native born is a member of the destination country. In short, what should immigrants do in order to be accepted by receiving nationals as “one of us”. Cross national data on 20 indicators of “everyday nationhood” were collected from five countries – Singapore, Japan, Australia, Finland, and Canada. The markers highlight common dispositions, activities, or social norms that are associated with citizenship. Exploratory factor analysis in each sample consistently demonstrated a two-factor structure model that supports the contemporary ethnic-civic distinction, but the markers that make up each of the two dimensions vary between countries. No metric equivalence was found, and that the markers have culture-specific meanings. The framework offers a novel insight to intercultural relations. The results suggest that adaptation and social inclusion need to consider the norms and values practised in the recipient society, and how immigration may redefine intergroup boundaries.
KW - Acculturation
KW - Identity
KW - Inclusion
KW - Nationalism
KW - Social markers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086005728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086005728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.04.006
DO - 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.04.006
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85086005728
SN - 0147-1767
VL - 78
SP - 10
EP - 19
JO - International Journal of Intercultural Relations
JF - International Journal of Intercultural Relations
ER -