Why Do People Overwork at the Risk of Impairing Mental Health?

Sachiko Kuroda, Isamu Yamamoto

研究成果: Article

1 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

This study uses longitudinal data on Japanese workers to investigate the relationship between overwork and mental health. Conventional labor supply theory assumes that people allocate their hours of work and leisure to maximize personal utility. However, people sometimes overwork and underestimate the risks of its negative impact on their physical and/or mental health. We incorporate nonpecuniary factors into the conventional utility function. Empirical analysis reveals a nonlinear relationship between the number of hours worked and job satisfaction. We find that job satisfaction increases when people work more than 55 h per week. However, we also find that hours worked linearly erode workers’ mental health. These findings imply that people who overvalue job satisfaction work excessive hours, consequently damaging their mental health. People may hold incorrect beliefs and underestimate the mental health risks of overwork, which may lead them to work longer hours. Our findings imply that educational and regulatory interventions are needed for both workers and employers to reduce the detrimental impacts on mental health caused by overwork.

元の言語English
ジャーナルJournal of Happiness Studies
DOI
出版物ステータスAccepted/In press - 2018 1 1

Fingerprint

mental health
job satisfaction
worker
labor supply
health risk
employer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

これを引用

@article{62fdb046cadb4cfc86b717ebf2f00a15,
title = "Why Do People Overwork at the Risk of Impairing Mental Health?",
abstract = "This study uses longitudinal data on Japanese workers to investigate the relationship between overwork and mental health. Conventional labor supply theory assumes that people allocate their hours of work and leisure to maximize personal utility. However, people sometimes overwork and underestimate the risks of its negative impact on their physical and/or mental health. We incorporate nonpecuniary factors into the conventional utility function. Empirical analysis reveals a nonlinear relationship between the number of hours worked and job satisfaction. We find that job satisfaction increases when people work more than 55 h per week. However, we also find that hours worked linearly erode workers’ mental health. These findings imply that people who overvalue job satisfaction work excessive hours, consequently damaging their mental health. People may hold incorrect beliefs and underestimate the mental health risks of overwork, which may lead them to work longer hours. Our findings imply that educational and regulatory interventions are needed for both workers and employers to reduce the detrimental impacts on mental health caused by overwork.",
keywords = "Hours worked, Job satisfaction, Mental health, Overemployment, Overwork, Underemployment",
author = "Sachiko Kuroda and Isamu Yamamoto",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10902-018-0008-x",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Happiness Studies",
issn = "1389-4978",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why Do People Overwork at the Risk of Impairing Mental Health?

AU - Kuroda, Sachiko

AU - Yamamoto, Isamu

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This study uses longitudinal data on Japanese workers to investigate the relationship between overwork and mental health. Conventional labor supply theory assumes that people allocate their hours of work and leisure to maximize personal utility. However, people sometimes overwork and underestimate the risks of its negative impact on their physical and/or mental health. We incorporate nonpecuniary factors into the conventional utility function. Empirical analysis reveals a nonlinear relationship between the number of hours worked and job satisfaction. We find that job satisfaction increases when people work more than 55 h per week. However, we also find that hours worked linearly erode workers’ mental health. These findings imply that people who overvalue job satisfaction work excessive hours, consequently damaging their mental health. People may hold incorrect beliefs and underestimate the mental health risks of overwork, which may lead them to work longer hours. Our findings imply that educational and regulatory interventions are needed for both workers and employers to reduce the detrimental impacts on mental health caused by overwork.

AB - This study uses longitudinal data on Japanese workers to investigate the relationship between overwork and mental health. Conventional labor supply theory assumes that people allocate their hours of work and leisure to maximize personal utility. However, people sometimes overwork and underestimate the risks of its negative impact on their physical and/or mental health. We incorporate nonpecuniary factors into the conventional utility function. Empirical analysis reveals a nonlinear relationship between the number of hours worked and job satisfaction. We find that job satisfaction increases when people work more than 55 h per week. However, we also find that hours worked linearly erode workers’ mental health. These findings imply that people who overvalue job satisfaction work excessive hours, consequently damaging their mental health. People may hold incorrect beliefs and underestimate the mental health risks of overwork, which may lead them to work longer hours. Our findings imply that educational and regulatory interventions are needed for both workers and employers to reduce the detrimental impacts on mental health caused by overwork.

KW - Hours worked

KW - Job satisfaction

KW - Mental health

KW - Overemployment

KW - Overwork

KW - Underemployment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050367108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050367108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10902-018-0008-x

DO - 10.1007/s10902-018-0008-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85050367108

JO - Journal of Happiness Studies

JF - Journal of Happiness Studies

SN - 1389-4978

ER -